I would expect police to get a warrant before getting access to my phone records, for example, as I think I have a reasonable expectation of privacy as to whom I communicate on my private device. The 4th Amendment to the Constitution protects me against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires police to obtain a search warrant from the judicial branch in most instances when they’re entering my property or another space where I have an expectation of privacy. They didn’t sign any waiver saying, ‘Oh, it’s okay to turn my information, my photo, over to the FBI.’ No elected officials voted for that to happen.” “No individual signed off on that when they renewed their driver’s license, got their driver’s licenses. “They’ve just given access to that to the FBI,” he said. Jim Jordan (Ohio), the House Oversight Committee’s ranking Republican, seemed particularly incensed during a hearing into the technology last month at the use of driver’s license photos in federal facial-recognition searches without the approval of state legislators or individual license holders. Cummings (D-Md.) said in a statement to The Post. “Law enforcement’s access of state databases,” particularly DMV databases, is “often done in the shadows with no consent,” House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah E. What if I were caught on video at a crime scene and police wanted me for questioning? Would it be proper to use my photo to identify me? I can’t think of a good reason to object. If my fingerprints were found at the scene of the crime, would it be legitimate to scan the database to identity me? I should think so. So, the question is: to what legitimate aims may those be put? I’m not a criminal and they have several sets of my fingerprints going back to college, too, because it’s part of the security clearance process. I’ve actually done that multiple times over the last four decades and change-several military dependent ID cards, military ID cards, contractor and DOD civilian ID cards, passports, etc. After all, I went to a government office, waited around for a considerable period of time, posed for said photo, and then gave them money in exchange for a license. It’s hardly a shocking revelation that the government has my photo. But my immediate reaction to this news is: So? I’m more worried about government intrusion into citizens’ privacy and abuse of authority by law enforcement than most. Washington Post, “ FBI, ICE find state driver’s license photos are a gold mine for facial-recognition searches “ But the DMV records contain the photos of a vast majority of a state’s residents, most of whom have never been charged with a crime. Police have long had access to fingerprints, DNA and other “biometric data” taken from criminal suspects. Thousands of facial-recognition requests, internal documents and emails over the past five years, obtained through public-records requests by Georgetown Law researchers and provided to The Washington Post, reveal that federal investigators have turned state departments of motor vehicles databases into the bedrock of an unprecedented surveillance infrastructure. Should it?Īgents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Immigration and Customs Enforcement have turned state driver’s license databases into a facial-recognition gold mine, scanning through millions of Americans’ photos without their knowledge or consent, newly released documents show. #Ice driver license facial recognition drivers#The discovery that federal law enforcement agencies are using state drivers license databanks to augment their ability to identify suspects is drawing criticism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |